View profile

The Apple Bank

I'm fascinated by today's scoop in The Wall Street Journal by Tripp Mickle, Liz Hoffman, and Peter Ru
First Draught
The Apple Bank
By M.G. Siegler • Issue #154 • View online
I’m fascinated by today’s scoop in The Wall Street Journal by Tripp Mickle, Liz Hoffman, and Peter Rudegeair that Apple is on the verge of launching a credit card product alongside Goldman Sachs. The report is an extension of one from last year, but with some intriguing new details. And, of course, it’s an intriguing new time for Apple. As the mantra these days seems all about three things: services, services, and services.
I’ve long wondered if Apple wouldn’t have to become a bank eventually. The logic is pretty simple: the iPhone is one of the – if not the – best business of all time. Another product in the typical Apple mold, no matter how insanely great, is unlikely to match it. Instead, Apple would have to look to some of the other biggest industries in the world. Industries like oil, cars, and yes, banking.
To be clear, this isn’t the launch of the Apple Bank (lawyers, rev those lawsuit engines!), but it is a first step in that general direction. Or really, a second, more tangible step, after the launch of Apple Pay. And while the WSJ dismisses that product as not interesting, my instinct continues to be that this is incorrect. While Apple Pay perhaps hasn’t been a rocket out of the gate like some other products, I feel like it has really come into its own over the past year or so. I now see it accepted basically everywhere, and more importantly, used constantly while out and about.
Anyway, this supposed Apple credit card is all about getting better service fees while at the same time increasing the utility of their payment services, with monetary health equations similar to the ones they give us on the physical health side. Makes sense.
What doesn’t make complete sense is the Goldman part of the equation. Beyond the current brand risk, it’s just a weird partnership. But taking a step back, it might make some sense if you view it as similar to the one Apple struck with AT&T (then Cingular) around the initial launch of the iPhone. AT&T needed Apple as much as Apple needed AT&T. And here, Goldman seems to need Apple in an attempt to jumpstart their fledgling “Marcus” banking business aimed at young folk.
The general “newfangled banking” space is insanely competitive right now with startups galore, many of which are interesting and doing well. But this type of partnership provides a unique entry point into hundreds of millions of potential pockets.
And, for both sides, it gets around going overboard with the all-important perks of credit cards these days. Such perks seem to be eating banks alive – here, there’s a simple cash-back component, maybe augmented by deals on Apple products themselves, but the card, if successful, should make Apple (and Goldman) a lot of money. Service money.
Drinking: a Russian River Blind Pig IPA 🍻

5ish Links
Cold Takes
Rob Manfred Says Baseball Doesn’t Have a Free Agency Crisis
Samsung’s Galaxy Fold Makes No Sense
A Giphy To Go
Did you enjoy this issue?
M.G. Siegler

A regular collection of thoughts and things and thoughts on things from around the internet.

If you don't want these updates anymore, please unsubscribe here
If you were forwarded this newsletter and you like it, you can subscribe here
Powered by Revue
188 The Embarcadero, San Francisco, CA 94105